Dawkins' Dog Kennel

Denny again. This time claiming that atheists have destroyed the credibility of science. Further evidence, were it needed, that religion breeds stupidity if left unchecked.

This scumbag is a right little charmer, isn’t he. I’m almost tempted to turn gay just to spite poisonous idiots like him.

David Wolcott posted a video where he claimed Richard Dawkins advocated the murder of children. This was out of context and what was said was that it was arguably preferable to allow children with incurable and insufferably painful diseases a humane end rather than force upon them a life of incurable misery.

When confronted over his misinterpretation, David Wolcott decided to draw a parallel between those children and the victims of the Sandy Hook shootings, asking whether it was therefore more humane to have killed them earlier. Those children were not ill, they were not facing endless days of incurable agony - yet David cannot see how this is different?

This must be one of the sickest, most grotesquely vile and offensive comments I have read in a long while. Sadly Mr Wolcott is prone to such utterances and once claimed a priest prayed a brain into a baby born without out, yet which somehow had a measurable IQ of 1.

It is the likes of Wolcott that turn me against religion so fervently.

There are times you get into a discussion with somebody whose argument is so circular that you can’t help but think if they were a dog they’d have a mouthful of their own tail. Utterly stupid.

The above post was in reply to my posing the following challenge to Mike.

————————————————————————————————-

Mike Pincher, read through this and the associated pages.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/relevance/Imedical.shtml  

Then kindly produce evidence that creationist science is able to serve humanity, to aid the advancements in medicine etc, that evolutionary biology does on a daily basis.

If you cannot do so, or resort to ad homs and obfuscation, then you will be taken to have admitted defeat.

————————————————————————————————-

And they wonder why I find them amusing!? Mike is a lawyer in California, seriously!

This was posted over on Facebook but needs seeing, so I’ve nicked it for here :)

Facebook allow pages that are hateful towards atheists. Why?

Judging by many of the creationists I encounter online anyway!

Eric “Shrek” Johnson banning ‘fake atheists’ from his page on Facebook. What is a ‘fake atheist’? Any atheist who doesn’t go out and proselytize atheism as Eric does with Christianity.

The above quotes were said to somebody who is pretty much a full time carer, so when are they supposed to find the time to bother people in ‘real life’ about atheism even if they wanted to!?

Eric Johnson is a complete imbecile. And a hypocrite. Another reason I increasingly call myself anti-theist.

From Facebook. My response to her previous drivel is in yellow, Tina’s reply is in red.

Basically she’s arguing that a mass murderer could kill hundreds of atheists, each of whom will burn in hell for eternity regardless how good their lives were, but the murderer can still “justly” go to heaven if he repents later. Yet the atheists don’t get a pardon, and that’s okay.

You wonder why I despise religion more each day? 

This short-bus window-licker is a fundamentalist Christian on Facebook. I was unaware the “thou shalt not kill” commandment was no longer applicable to them.