Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!! *facepaw* *facepaw* *facepaw*
He honestly expects me to find information supporting the use of evolutionary biology on creationist/ID websites? I’ve seen some pretty dumb requests in my time but that one? LOLZ
This is why they should have instigated a minimum IQ for using the internet. This level of stupids might be contagious it’s that strong.
I say again *facepaw*
The above post was in reply to my posing the following challenge to Mike.
Mike Pincher, read through this and the associated pages.
Then kindly produce evidence that creationist science is able to serve humanity, to aid the advancements in medicine etc, that evolutionary biology does on a daily basis.
If you cannot do so, or resort to ad homs and obfuscation, then you will be taken to have admitted defeat.
And they wonder why I find them amusing!? Mike is a lawyer in California, seriously!
Apparently some are still confused so maybe this will help. Probably not.
Judging by many of the creationists I encounter online anyway!
Made this as a result of yet another debate with one of those Christians on Facebook who so helpfully likes to clean windows orally.
The above post appeared on Facebook tonight, where Nancy was arguing for the historical accuracy of the Bible. Yet it contains the most rank hypocrisy, as can be shown by rewording her own post thus;
It is complete and utter stupidity to think that evolution is all a bunch of gibberish..
Scientists base much of their work and finances on the fact of evolution’s accuracy, they DEPEND on it..
If it’s weren’t so accurate, scientists would have given up this endeavor long ago, but it is accurate and the subject has gained the respect from many scientific fields, who would think most people here to be sheer idiots who haven’t done any investigations on their own, but repeat what their so called so & so creationist friends say…
Nancy will repeatedly dismiss evolution, claiming scientists will one day come to realize the bible was right. Yet can the exact same thing not be said of the creationist position, given that wealth of evidence?
After all, what evidence is there for the bible’s history, aside the bible? Sure, places mentioned existed (at least some did), and even many of the characters mentioned may well have existed. That isn’t evidence for the acts that are attributed to those people or places.
Evolution, on the other hand, has so much evidence it is beyond all reasonable doubt. There is no debate within mainstream science as to whether we evolved, we did, it’s a fact just as the heliocentric model of the solar system is a fact.
But scientists are talking gibberish. Right Nancy, you silly ickle fundie ;)
Kim Balogh, posting on Facebook.
This deluded, dishonest mooncalf of a woman is currently writing a book which will be given to students. In this book she gives 15 questions evolutionist can’t answer. She also claimed there is a massive number of scientists who reject evolution.
She ignored several links to every one of those questions being comprehensively answered.
She refused to supply a list of the supposed massive number of scientists.
She is, to put it bluntly, an intellectually dishonest, fraudulent peddler of lies to children. I don’t care if she takes exception to this, she’s a vile, pernicious, insidious, obnoxious, arrogant … personage. As you can see from this post, she’s also likely to be clinically insane!
Jesus would be so very proud!
In response to olebiscuit’s question below (as I can’t see how to reply anywhere!) … She’s Canadian. Thankfully people like her are very, very much a rarity in the UK!